Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Claudio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 00:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Claudio

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Non-notable. Minor artiste, coverage. scope_creep^Talk 00:37, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, she's been on the Billboard charts multiple times[1][2], been on national TV as a tribute to Marvin Gaye[3], shes had 2 albums published by Kromatik [4][5], shes been published about a load of times[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]... And I'm pretty sure there is a few notable inclusions on Youtube. She's been all over the world supporting big name acts. She's not a famous star per se but she's sort of like a cult personality to that scene. And she's great, a powerful and pretty musical exhibitionist who appeared just a few years too late for what she does to make her a recognisable name. She did a great TEDx once. Actually you've reminded me, if the article isn't deleted, I wonder if I can convince the owner of this photo to release the copyright for the purpose of the article. ~ R.T.G 03:20, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The numerous citiations provided by RTG are compelling. Looks like a legitimate article to me. Cabrils (talk) 05:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 05:14, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:48, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It seems to be case. If everybody doesn't mind, I will withdrawn the nomination tomorrow. scope_creep^Talk 08:59, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.